"Co-located branches" by convention

Ian Clatworthy ian.clatworthy at canonical.com
Fri Dec 4 02:44:21 GMT 2009


John Arbash Meinel wrote:

> personally, I think the previous "shared tree" approach was much more
> powerful. Yes, I'm used to the model. But I frequently share branches
> between two "active" working trees.
> 
> It seems a shame to lose that ability.

I was considering keeping it as an option and probably will given that
you like it. Thanks for the feedback.

Ian C.



More information about the bazaar mailing list