Default performance of ‘lp:foo’ URLs
andrew.bennetts at canonical.com
Tue Dec 1 02:59:01 GMT 2009
Robert Collins wrote:
> I'm not sure that it is easier - anonymous ssh may need clientside
> handholding (facts needed).
I don't think so; our client-side SSH support already knows how to supply a
username to SSH. Perhaps some SSH clients will expect that they must do
password or publickey auth, but if the server merrily accepts any auth attempt
at all for the anonymous user (and I think that's easy to implement) then even
that shouldn't be a problem.
More information about the bazaar