"Co-located branches" by convention
John Arbash Meinel
john at arbash-meinel.com
Mon Nov 30 14:21:38 GMT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Martin Pool wrote:
> 2009/12/1 Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at canonical.com>:
> I think it's an interesting way to experiment with it. I'd certainly
> hope that eventually this gets solved in some standard way across
> Bazaar not in similar but adhoc ways across explorer, nested trees,
> and whatever, but perhaps this is a good way to get there.
personally, I think the previous "shared tree" approach was much more
powerful. Yes, I'm used to the model. But I frequently share branches
between two "active" working trees.
It seems a shame to lose that ability. Though I agree needing the extra
level of dirs is more "obviously" in your way.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar