"Co-located branches" by convention

John Arbash Meinel john at arbash-meinel.com
Mon Nov 30 14:21:38 GMT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Pool wrote:
> 2009/12/1 Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at canonical.com>:
>> Thoughts?
> 
> I think it's an interesting way to experiment with it.  I'd certainly
> hope that eventually this gets solved in some standard way across
> Bazaar not in similar but adhoc ways across explorer, nested trees,
> and whatever, but perhaps this is a good way to get there.
> 

personally, I think the previous "shared tree" approach was much more
powerful. Yes, I'm used to the model. But I frequently share branches
between two "active" working trees.

It seems a shame to lose that ability. Though I agree needing the extra
level of dirs is more "obviously" in your way.

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksT1PIACgkQJdeBCYSNAANlRQCgsg9UvMHiAQPGVXDD0QJOCAtk
WaEAn2zQwTyk1pEeDW+Cc7zjb+2OYV/X
=2lEX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the bazaar mailing list