My thoughts on bzr sub-teams
Robert Collins
robertc at robertcollins.net
Thu Nov 26 10:09:21 GMT 2009
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 17:25 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
>
> * We could subscribe the bzr-core team to each sub-team as it was
> created so members of core would remain across most conversations.
The 'bzr-core' team on launchpad is a bit strangely named - its 'folk
that are only interested in core', not 'core developers'. But sure.
> Does this sound like a sound strategy? In particular, I'd like to know
> if there are non-core people out there who would be interested in
> taking
> on the leadership positions I described either in existing teams or
> suggested teams, assuming we agreed to form them.
>
> Maybe I'd dreaming but I see plenty of amazing people out there who
> have
> the ability to accelerate Bazaar. Could you contribute more if we gave
> your more structure as outlined above? Just think of all those speed
> improvements John could make if he wasn't building Windows installers,
> code improvements Martin could make if he wasn't triaging bugs, etc!
>
> Thoughts?
I think that open source project tend to make that space themselves, but
I've no objections to the experiment - the worst outcome would be a
no-op and some coordination time; the best a significant scaling
improvement.
-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20091126/1a2962ae/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list