Launchpad reviews (was Re: Patch Pilot report)
Robert Collins
robert.collins at canonical.com
Tue Nov 24 00:45:08 GMT 2009
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:24 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
>
> These are kind of captured, but not optimally clearly or easily, and
> they're not clearly displayed on the overview page. (For instance
> there is a bug about confusion between 'needs fixing', 'needs
> information', 'approved' - I suspect when people cannot understand the
> formal categories they leave it blank.)
I would love for 'tweak' to come back. It was most excellent, and not
having it is a significant issue for getting rid of pqm-submit (either
by pqm scanning for approved merges, or using tarmac). I think I mean
that saying:
"This is conceptually ok and once you do X it should be landed" doesn't
sit well under 'needs fixing' at the comment level - and at the merge
level itself its not really represented at all.
-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20091124/3477eee0/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list