[RFC] depend on testtools for testing?

[Robert Collins]

On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:21 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> 
> Tactically though, timing and ease-of-development is everything. For
> example, I'd like assurances than the developers making this change
> would test and document the setup for developers on Windows as part of
> the switch. We need more people running the test suite there, not
> less.

I don't have a windows machine, but I'd be happy to defer landing
anything until such setup was documented based on code in a branch.

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20091030/f62f3b33/attachment.pgp