bzr svn-import with a deep branch layout

Russ Brown pickscrape at gmail.com
Wed Oct 28 21:05:44 GMT 2009


On Wednesday 28 October 2009 12:57:41 pm Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 10:28 -0500, Russ Brown wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 10:05:21 am John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> > > Russ Brown wrote:
> > > > Are my suspicions correct, and if so is there any way to get
> > > > svn-import to detect branches by noticing copies of trunk, rather
> > > > than simply looking for subdirectories of branches?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > I'm pretty sure you can teach bzr-svn about custom branching schemes. I
> > > don't remember all of the details, though.
> >
> > That would probably help, though one complication is that to begin with
> > we did create branches directly beneath "branches" before switching to
> > categories as the number of branches we had somewhat exploded. I'm not
> > sure how well it would handle the overlap period.
> >
> > I do however seem to remember Jelmer talking some time ago about the
> > branch layouts being phased out in favour of branch detection based on
> > the copy source, though I could be wrong.
> >
> > Here we go: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-svn/+bug/130372
> >
> > Doesn't really explain what the new mechanism is though.
> 
> You can use "bzr svn-layout" to see what sort of repository layout
> bzr-svn thinks it should use for a particular repository.
> 
> See "bzr help svn-layout" for more information on manually setting the
> repository layout that should be used. You can use wildcards.
> 

Yes, see my other mail on this thread about how I'm making use of this feature 
to solve the problem using something of a brute-force method.

> We can't just rely on considering everything that is derived from trunk
> as a branch, as this assumes that there is a main branch - which is not
> necessarily true. It would also require finding the ancestry of all
> directories in the latest revision to see if they derive from trunk,
> which would have performance consequences.
> 

Granted, but couldn't this just be another repository layout definition? i.e. 
"One defined trunk, with a directory tree of branches with arbitrary nesting".

There are obviously things I don't know about this problem domain as I've not 
spent years working on a tool such as bzr-svn, but it seems to me that the 
detection would only need to happen at the point of revision import, would 
only need to look at added directories, and would only need to look for those 
copied from the defined "trunk" directory. In other words, automating what my 
brute force method does, and do it on the fly, incrementally. 

> Cheers,
> 
> Jelmer
> 

-- 

Russ



More information about the bazaar mailing list