upgrade bzr.dev to rich roots?

[Martin Pool]

2009/4/8 Andrew Bennetts <andrew.bennetts at canonical.com>:
> Robert Collins wrote:
>> So, I'd like to be dogfooding --development6-rich-root. The project I
>> write most code for is bzr, but we're not a rich-root using project.
>>
>> So, I propose we upgrade bzr to rich roots.
>
> This also means dogfooding a transition to using rich-root, which is
> valuable too :)
>
> Sounds like a good idea to me.

Received: from chlorine.canonical.com (chlorine.canonical.com [91.189.94.204])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30DAB7BA5
	for <mbp at sourcefrog.net>; Fri,  2 Oct 2009 01:23:10 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com)
	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <bazaar-bounces at lists.canonical.com>)
	id 1MtNUU-0008Rn-TH; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:22:47 +0100
Received: from fuchsia.puzzling.org ([65.49.60.222])
	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <andrew-bounce at puzzling.org>) id 1LrQIb-0001Qj-0n
	for bazaar at lists.canonical.com; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:26:09 +0100

Wow.

I'll forward it to our sysadmins.



-- 
Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>