What else is required before announcing 2.0.0?

[Martin Pool]

2009/9/28 Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at canonical.com>:
> Martin,
>
> It looks like the word is leaking out w.r.t. 2.0.0 with 1000+ downloads
> of the Windows installer in the last few days. The Wiki and LP page both
> make it clear that 2.0.0 is out. Jari and others are improving Wiki
> pages (like BzrFeatures) which is great and it sounds like the PPA
> consistency issues are all sorted, yes?
>
> It would be nice if:
>
> 1. the OS X installers were ready to go before the big announcement
> 2. the new website was in place
> 3. anything else?
>
> It looks like Jean-Francois and Guillermo made great progress on (1) in
> the last 24 hours so I'm *guessing* we'll have OS X installers within
> the next day or two, all going well.
>
> Is the website deployment days away or more? I'm guessing the latter.
>
> Is there anything else blocking an official 2.0.0 announcement? If not,
> should we wait for the (core) OS X installers and then do it? Or just do
> it now? Or ... ?

I think we should just do it now, probably today (UTC+1).  I probably
should have done it Friday but travel etc...

-- 
Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>