metronome mail for Bazaar 2.0 and 1.18
mbp at canonical.com
Tue Sep 8 23:16:53 BST 2009
2009/9/9 John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com>:
> Right, without the things that we usually bundle. Not to mention
> rebuilding all of the ppas, Mac OS X installer, etc. *That* is the
> overhead, and time I think would be better spent packaging 2.0. Versus
> backporting features to a 1.18 release. If 2.0 wasn't next week, I would
> be more inclined to do a 1.18.1.
Given the features are already merged, I think I will at least make a
1.18.1 tarball, since Alexander asks. If some platform maintainers
don't feel it's worth re-rerolling their distributions, that's also
ok. (In the stable-release scheme they are going to have some
discretion to choose what to ship.)
Is it possible that Alexander could make and upload the Windows binaries?
More information about the bazaar