bzr-explorer - ubuntu desktop

[Alexander Belchenko]

Algis Kabaila пишет:
> On Friday 04 September 2009 19:56:09 Alexander Belchenko wrote:
>> Algis Kabaila пишет:
>>> On Friday 04 September 2009 15:12:08 Ian Clatworthy wrote:
>>>> Algis Kabaila wrote:
>>>>> Yes, whilst "bzr help qbzr" is a bit of a lemon, "bzr qbzr" works very
>>>>> nicely, thank you.  No help available - as yet?  Is it correct to
>>>>> assume that the implemented commands of qbzr are commit, pull and push
>>>>> only?
>>>> "bzr qbzr" launches an unsupported, experimental application. (The other
>>>> 25-30 q* commands provided by the QBzr plugin are supported.)
>>> Sorry, but I don't understand where exactly are the other 25-20 (q*)
>>> commands. What is a q* command, anyway?
>> Run this:
>>
>> bzr help commands | grep qbzr
>>
>> You'll see the list of all commands provided by QBzr plugin.
>> Most of these commands has prefix with "q" letter. That's why we call
>> them q-commands (qbzr commands).
> 
> Q1: Ok, so I see the list of commands:
> merge, qannotate, qbranch, qbrowse, qcat, qcommit, qconfig, qlog,            
> qpull, qpush.  

That's right. Actually "merge" is builtin bzr command, but qbzr in the 
past overrode it to provide additional feature (--qpreview).

> I would like to try a "harmless" command, say "qlog". So what is the command 
> line in the CLI for one of those commands or are all the commands available in 
> a GUI of a later version of qbzr, later than (0.9.4) that comes as an ubuntu 
> 9.04 package ?

All those commands are regular bzr commands and you should invoke them 
as regualr bzr commands:

"bzr qlog", "bzr qdiff", "bzr qcommit"

> Q2: "пишет" is present tense, = "writes" . Why is it not the past tense, i.e.  
> "wrote"?  Don't answer Q2 if it annoys you  :)

Ha ha ha ha. This is funny.
I never can imagine somebody who don't understand Russian will be so 
pedantic to translate it and ask.

Actually this is default behavior of my mail client (Mozilla 
Thunderbird, Russian build) and I never trying figure out how to change it.

But I can explain the reason for using present time.

Actually Russian language is more flexible in this case and no one 
native Russian will complain. But in the same time Russian language has 
different ending of the same base verb for masculine and feminine (and 
even for neuter), so you can't translate "wrote" correctly until you 
know for sure "who" exactly wrote what is written :-) So in Russian you 
need to use "написал" or "написала" or "написало". Some applications 
created by average programmers use something like this: "написал(а)" but 
this is ugly, is not?

Fortunately "writes" in present time has the same form for masculine and 
feminine, so this is safe choice.

> Thanks, Alexander.  What a shame I have not installed Cyrillic script... I 
> could make even more spelling and grammar mistakes with it than I manage to do 
> in the English version  :)

Well, I understand that I do many spelling/grammar errors in English, 
and I'm sorry for this. Not sure what is your point in the sentence above.

> 
> OldAl.
>