RFC: remove traceback from "newer branch format than your bzr"

[Ben Finney]

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

> Martin Pool writes:
> 
>  > $ bzr branch....
>  > AbsentContentFactory has no attribute...
>  > This probably indicates a bug in Bazaar.  Sorry.  For help or to
>  > report a bug see http://bazaar-......
[…]

>     AbsentContentFactory has no attribute ...
>     This probably indicates a bug in Bazaar.  Please report this by
>     going to http://bugs.bazaar-vcs.org/ and creating a bug report.

As a side, but IMO important, point of HCI: I'm convinced that “Sorry”
is not a word that should appear in error messages. The error should
make clear where the responsibility is, but not attempt to falsely
anthropomorphise the computer.

So in that respect, I see Stephen's versions of the error messages as
superior here.

-- 
 \      “The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part |
  `\                                        of the face.” —Jack Handey |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney