[qbzr] Re: [RFC] push and --no-strict and QBzr
martinpool at gmail.com
Fri Jul 24 00:48:40 BST 2009
2009/7/24 Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net>:
>> The general idea was that people would be more confused when "bzr push"
>> didn't push what they thought they were pushing (I forgot to commit,
>> etc), rather than having to supply a new argument when they really did
>> want to push something out of the ordinary.
>> There was also a strong push from MySQL. I don't know if they wanted it
>> to be the default, they *definitely* wanted to be able to have it as the
>> default for some people. (push_strict=True). As one of the reoccurring
>> issues for MySQL was people pushing and not realizing that they had not
>> committed. (I think some of this stemmed from using BK which
>> automatically commits when you 'merge', while we require it as a
>> separate step.)
> I went to the similar conclusion about this option, but I still think this
> change has introduced too much penalty to existing experienced bzr users,
> and we have to pay this price for the sake of newbies safety.
> I'm not agreed with such price somewhere deep inside me.
I too thought it was a good idea, but I'd be prepared to change it
now. Robert posted before that this is probably a case where we
should notify people and make it easy to fix their mistake (by
committing and pushing again), rather than blocking it. So I'd like a
patch that makes it just warn unless --strict is given, and no warning
at all if --quiet is given. I cc'd GuilhemB in case he wants to
More information about the bazaar