[rfc] transport activity locally?
John Arbash Meinel
john at arbash-meinel.com
Mon Jul 20 22:42:02 BST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Martin Pool wrote:
> That's what I was planning to do next - but I think there is a lot of
> code that bypasses it.
>> On Jul 20, 2009 11:37 PM, "Aaron Bentley" <aaron at aaronbentley.com
>> <mailto:aaron at aaronbentley.com>> wrote:
> Martin Pool wrote: > The annoying thing here is that it says all
> application code needs to > know w...
> We can make Command.outf pb-aware. I think that would handle
> everything, assuming we carefully stamped out all use of sys.stdout.
We also have to have 'trace.note()' which wants to use the logging
module and eventually writes to sys.stderr. And all the other
'trace.XXX' functions know about the current UI factory and to call
At one point we tried putting the functionality on "ProgressBar" itself,
but I'm pretty sure we decided to deprecate that.
FWIW bzrlib.trace.note() may already call ui.ui_factory...clear_somethnig()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar