RFC: bzr rm is hard to use

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote:
> I'll accept anything that works.
> 
> However, 'rm' seems to be a trigger point in UI design - its been around
> a few times because everyone wants it to do what they usually do :).
> 
> Here's an alternative simpler to explain version:
> 'bzr rm foo' will make unversion and delete foo, making backups with the
> same rules 'bzr revert' uses.

You've left out some of the rules that revert uses:
- - revert of an added file that was modified by bzr deletes it.

I don't really get why it makes sense to sometimes rename the file when
unversioning it, and sometimes not.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpge/MACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI3JVQCaAt0O1hItyFBLWMvJ1mxNCWTm
5aUAn2AoP8wjqdE8AARxoWo6MlbBoohy
=pm/E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----