Idiomatic working

[Guy Gascoigne-Piggford]

I guess I'm still rather confused.  What exactly is the difference between
creating your upstream mirror (and I'm not at all sure that I'm not implying
something that I don't mean by using that word) as a bound branch or as a
checkout.  I use the checkout and I'm pretty comfortable with what it does
and how it works, but I keep hearing about mirror branches and bound
branches and suspect that I'm missing a useful technique here.

Guy


On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net> wrote:

> Aaron Bentley пишет:
> > Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> >> John Szakmeister ?8H5B:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Russel
> >>> Winder<russel.winder at concertant.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 09:32 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> His point was to have a branch which is a perfect mirror of the
> >>>>> upstream
> >>>>> branch. And his question was whether it was better to maintain this
> via
> >>>>> "bzr checkout" or via "bzr push/pull".
> >>>> That is correct, except that actually I tend to do a branch and then
> >>>> bind rather than a checkout.  I had sort of assumed this ends up being
> >>>> the same thing, but does it?
> >>> Yes.
> >> There is one small difference:
> >
> >> after branching user will have public branch set in branch.conf
> >
> > Parent branch.  Public branch is only set by "send" and "create-mirror"
> > from bzrtools, at the moment.
>
> Yes, you're right. It was typo.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090714/15cdf061/attachment.htm