most authoritative branch for bzr dev?

[Robert Collins]

There aren't any policy issues with PQM pushing straight to lp, and I
want us to do this because:
 - as the largest bzr hosting site out there, we'll be experiencing the
common behaviour for other users.
 - it will reduce latency for merge proposals, which will work around
the problem with launchpad code review generating bogus diffs
 - it means that the most recent code will be immediately visible in
launchpad's loggerhead and web ui.

We've been trying to get things in place - so that there are no moving
parts to fix - before raising the proposal.

However, we've encountered consistent problems with pqm talking to lp,
as John mentioned.

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090707/063d26ae/attachment.pgp