most authoritative branch for bzr dev?
robertc at robertcollins.net
Tue Jul 7 01:35:41 BST 2009
There aren't any policy issues with PQM pushing straight to lp, and I
want us to do this because:
- as the largest bzr hosting site out there, we'll be experiencing the
common behaviour for other users.
- it will reduce latency for merge proposals, which will work around
the problem with launchpad code review generating bogus diffs
- it means that the most recent code will be immediately visible in
launchpad's loggerhead and web ui.
We've been trying to get things in place - so that there are no moving
parts to fix - before raising the proposal.
However, we've encountered consistent problems with pqm talking to lp,
as John mentioned.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090707/063d26ae/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar