RFC: iter_changes with specific_files, status and commit

[John Szakmeister]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
[snip]
> I can't think of any problems at the moment.

It's a bit weird for the user to provide a path asking about the
status of X, and then having the command also tell you the status of
Y.  That seems like a behavior we're going to have to explain to them.
 Is it a big deal?  Perhaps not.  Is it unintuitive?  Definitely.

-John