launchpad milestones only for releases not rcs?

[Bob Tanner]

On 2009-05-07 17:43:34 -0500, Martin Pool <mbp at canonical.com> said:

> I was just wondering if there is much point having Launchpad
> milestones (as bug targetting points) for release candidates as
> opposed to the actual release.  If we're trying to fix something for
> 1.14 then we'll be trying to get it in the rc, and if it misses rc1
> we'll be trying for rc2 or the final release.  Having a shorter list
> is simpler.
> 
> There is the point that milestones have target dates, and if there is
> only one for a release when would we put it?  On the other hand I
> don't think we refer to the dates in Launchpad very often.

Sorry to dumb up an old thread.....

I'm starting the 1.15rc1 release process and part of my (unpublished) 
release docs state to create the next  Milestone after release.

I've read the thread a couple times and I don't see a definiative answer.

Just keeping 1.15 and not doing rc milestones so all bugs get targetted 
to 1.15?

Keep doing rc milestones?

Thanks.

-- 
Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com>                  | Phone : (952 943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Linux, OSX, VMware | Fax   : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = F785 DDFC CF94 7CE8 AA87 3A9D 3895 26F1 0DDB E378