[RFC] proposed user doc for nested trees

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>     aaron> Please see
>     aaron> http://bazaar-vcs.org/NestedTreesDesign#sub-branches
>     aaron> and tell me if there's more I can do to clarify.
> 
> What about adding: "All these local branches will share the
> repository of the containing tree" ?

I didn't mean to imply that.  As it stands, the local branches will only
share the repository of the containing tree when that repository is a
shared repository, following the normal rules for repository sharing.

I'm not necessarily against using the repository of the containing tree.

Did you mean that if the containing tree's repository was standalone, we
would automatically convert it to shared?

Or did you mean that we would refuse to create a branch if the
containing tree's repository is not share?

Or did you mean that we would create a new branch type that can use a
standalone repository as if it's a shared repository?

Aaron

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkoLEpUACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI2CKACdEEdb+SB0ywBPONukCwtvLUwG
4ZkAnicFQjYgH/j8lIqDQ2h09fha0v79
=l1TN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----