[MERGE][Bug 194716] Implement pull --local
Gary van der Merwe
garyvdm at gmail.com
Tue May 5 21:16:30 BST 2009
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
> 2009/4/30 John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com>:
>> John Arbash Meinel has voted approve.
>> Status is now: Semi-approved
>> I've come to think that '--local' options shouldn't actually exist, because
>> it gets you into a hybrid mode. If you really wanted a separate branch
>> locally, then you should just use one.
>> Anyway, for now we have '--local' and this fills in a gap for its
>> functionality, so I'm willing to approve it. I just wanted to mention that
>> the overall goal seems to be in the wrong direction.
> I agree.
I still need one more approve.
Martin: since you have all ready looked at this, please could you do a review?
More information about the bazaar