Looms compatible default format?

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Looms currently require a custom branch format that's provided by the
> looms plugin. This makes it impossible to open loom branches unless you
> have the looms plugin.
> 
> How much code would be required to support the required methods for
> looms on the new branch format implementation? If it's a small amount of
> code, would this be useful? Has this perhaps already been considered in
> the past?

I think that merely supporting the format as a branch format is not
desirable.  If we support opening looms in core bzr, we should open them
as looms, not as branches whose head depends on which thread is
currently active.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkn5uSwACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI0hQACfRJ0/TlYZN7BRCoIFty9ETVEq
wnsAn0+0W0EvrDIfNNG6ptFC8yzVT/p5
=jeCu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----