Looms compatible default format?
aaron at aaronbentley.com
Thu Apr 30 15:44:00 BST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Looms currently require a custom branch format that's provided by the
> looms plugin. This makes it impossible to open loom branches unless you
> have the looms plugin.
> How much code would be required to support the required methods for
> looms on the new branch format implementation? If it's a small amount of
> code, would this be useful? Has this perhaps already been considered in
> the past?
I think that merely supporting the format as a branch format is not
desirable. If we support opening looms in core bzr, we should open them
as looms, not as branches whose head depends on which thread is
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar