Scoping the UI changes for 2.0

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 11:00 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Robert Collins <robert.collins at canonical.com> writes:
> 
> > I think its a lot easier to say to users 'upgrading to 3.0 is a disk
> > change' and to be able to stop talking about formats, than to say 'when
> > we make changes it won't affect you anymore'.
> 
> I'm not sure, but I think you're speaking in favour of:
> 
> > > > >> - a commitment to having ONE stable format throughout, and ONE
> > > > >> development format EVER in 3.0,
> 
> Yes?

Yes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090429/fc43b127/attachment.pgp