Scoping the UI changes for 2.0

[Ben Finney]

Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> writes:

> Karl Fogel wrote:
> > So instead of this:
> > 
> >> - a commitment to having ONE stable format throughout, and ONE
> >> development format EVER in 3.0,
> > 
> > How about this:
> > 
> >> - a commitment to backwards compatibility and isolating users from
> >> the effects of format changes.
> 
> I find that a lot easier to swallow.

It sure *sounds* nicer. But is it any more feasible? The former has the
significant advantage of being concrete, and having a technically
obvious implementation.

-- 
 \        “Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that, I'll be |
  `\              over here, looking through your stuff.” —Jack Handey |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090429/49d1d8d0/attachment.pgp