History editing

[Matthieu Moy]

Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at internode.on.net> writes:

> Yes, that's slower than letting rebase do everything for me *but*:
>
> * it really doesn't take long
> * I get the chance to improve both the ordering of changes and
>   commit messages
> * I can be reasonably confident that users or tools (like bisect)
>   coming along later will comprehend the history far better than
>   they would if I leave things to rebase.

Err, did you _really_ ever use "git rebase"? Do you know about the
option -i?

-- 
Matthieu