Better name for dpush wanted

[Russ Brown]

On 04/20/2009 10:19 AM, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ian Clatworthy wrote:
>> Putting my "better UI" hat on, I'm thinking of writing a spec called
>> something like "one concept, one command". It would suggest things
>> like turning init-repo into init --repo.
>
> I don't like this idea at all.  You wind up turning one command into
> several commands with no clear usage statement, because it varies
> according to what "actual" command you're doing.  You get boatloads of
> options that can only be used when particular other "options" (that are
> really subcommands) are used.
>
> We have this already with shelve --list, and I hate, hate, hate it.
> What does "shelve --list --destroy" mean?
>

Is this not an argument for bringing back bzr self?

> I also don't see how "one concept, one command" applies to turning
> init-repo into init --repo.  To me, they're not the same concept at all.
>
> Aaron
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAknsknIACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI04CgCeMS7miWxef8l8KCrsMk0fycRN
> wOoAn1gYIpxKOOFTwjgihlSE6hIBrPSJ
> =nGWq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>