Will re-basing support be added into Bazaar core ?
russel.winder at concertant.com
Mon Apr 20 07:26:04 BST 2009
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:14 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 13:16 +1200, Talden wrote:
> > Being in core it would
> > be likely to be maintained and tested more aggressively
> The core hackers mostly seem to advocate that rebasing is evil.
I have never understood why "Rebasing is Evil". Surely it is just
another tool in the armoury. Used judiciously it is a valuable tool.
Using it badly or inappropriately is the problem.
Personally I find it incredibly useful for long-term feature branches
where it is important to track the mainline branch and have the ability
to create a conflict free merge/patch.
> If they don't use it, I'm not sure it's a good idea to expect them to
> work on it, or in turn to rely on such a feature.
But this doesn't stop people making proposals for patches to the plugin,
and arguing for a move into core -- if such arguments can be made, I
don't know whether they can, I just use the plugin.
Only if strong correct arguments for change are made will it be
discoverable whether the core Bazaar development team are amenable to
change of view or just quasi-religious zealots. We all believe the
latter to be false, but there hasn't been a test yet.
However, might it be that a strong initial path would be to contribute
further tests to the plugin so that any perceived deficiencies in rebase
support are fixed there?
Dr Russel Winder Partner
Concertant LLP t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203
41 Buckmaster Road, f: +44 8700 516 084 voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
London SW11 1EN, UK. m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel at russel.org.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090420/07e366b0/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar