Better name for dpush wanted
ben+bazaar at benfinney.id.au
Fri Apr 17 03:17:06 BST 2009
Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at internode.on.net> writes:
> FWIW, the best suggestion I'd seen/heard so far is
> calling it "push-out".
I'm against adding another command; conceptually, it's the same
operation as ‘push’ with a different option.
My favourite is ‘push --foreign’.
Alternatively, if there's an identifiable “foo” that normal push has but
this push doesn't have, and which makes sense for the user, then ‘push
--no-foo’ is also okay.
\ “The most common way people give up their power is by thinking |
`\ they don't have any.” —Alice Walker |
More information about the bazaar