Better name for dpush wanted

[Robert Collins]

On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 10:58 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> Jelmer,
> 
> Did we ever get a better name for dpush (or option to
> push enabling it) agreed? I'd really like to see that
> happen before the current name gains any more inertia.

rebase-push maybe, or push --rebase, or something like that.

people understand rebase to rewrite history.

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090417/a5b068f9/attachment.pgp