[MERGE] groupcompress (brisbane)
robert.collins at canonical.com
Mon Apr 6 12:10:12 BST 2009
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:11 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > That said:
> > - the name could be changed even after landing in bzr.dev, lets not
> > block on that. We could go with ljcompress or something if you wanted,
> > but as groupcompress isn't part of the UI for brisbane-core I'm not sure
> > it matters at all.
> > - Lets do it.
> I like the sound of ljcompress. The name does end up in repo
> description strings so I think we want to go with it sooner rather
> than later unless someone objects (or provides a beter name).
Hmm, I don't think we want it in repo description strings; its jargon n
matter what we call it. [its fine for the disk format, but not the UI
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090406/16fce496/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar