[MERGE] Add sha generation support to versionedfiles (brisbane)

[Robert Collins]

On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 21:36 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 
> I'm a bit concerned that we'll lose a decent chunk of annotation
> history
> for things that get cherry-picked in this fashion. (At a minimum see
> the
> recent discussion about annotations and multiple revisions introducing
> the same content.)
> 
> So I'd sort of rather review things in bite-sized chunks, but then
> merge
> the whole branch if we can.

I could go either way. I don't think the annotations in this branch are
highly useful. Its 10% of the total size of bzr when I pull it into a
new bzr.dev branch and we've done a lot of exploring :).

So I'm leaning towards not merging the branch at all.

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090403/aa4ddb54/attachment.pgp