brisbane: initial cut at a mergeline cache
andrew.bennetts at canonical.com
Wed Apr 1 23:27:19 BST 2009
John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> So there is also a question about how to display revisions that haven't
> quite-yet been merged into your branch. If you number from source, then
> they get labeled as though they were merged, and probably end up with
> the same numbers.
Why would you be numbering revisions that aren't in your ancestry? To
describe a pending merge?
More information about the bazaar