Last day to vote/reject on proposed EOL names

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Ian Clatworthy wrote:
>   
>> Thanks to everyone for their thoughtful emails on picking
>> the right names for our EOL settings. Here's my latest
>> thinking - the names will be upwardly compatible with
>> those used for svn (except for cr which I'm not planning to add):
>>
>> * native
>> * lf
>> * crlf
>> * exact
>> * native:crlf
>> * lf:crlf
>> * crlf:crlf
>>   
>>     
> The current names seem intuitive to me, except for the last three. I
> guess there's not much we can do about that though yet, and they won't
> be an issue anymore anyway when rules become part of the tree and always
> enforced.
Actually, I think Eric's suggestion to have a separate option for the
repository format eol style makes a lot of sense.

Cheers,

Jelmer