[MERGE] 1.14 formats

Robert Collins robert.collins at canonical.com
Sat Mar 28 02:10:29 GMT 2009


bb:comment

Three things, the minor one first - are views really a staging area? 

Secondly, AFAICT views are not mature yet; are we ready to commit to
supporting them as they have been done so far?

More importantly, while I'm happy that filters are robust now and we can
bring in more facilities, every time we bring in a change that will lead
to silently doing the wrong thing in mixed version scenarios we need a
new format bump - and the ongoing changes to configuration for filtering
certainly meet this AIUI. So I'd say hold off - keep the new tree format
as beta, and polish it. 

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090328/40e7a648/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list