record_iter_changes and subtrees

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote:
> So, iter_changes and subtrees.
> 
> currently recursive='down'

recursive='down' in what context?

Aaron


 when there is a change in the subtree fails
> spectacularly because iter_changes doesn't examine the subtree and
> decides that the tree reference is unaltered.
> 
> For now, to get things ready to land I'm disabling using
> record_iter_changes when the repo supports subtreess which unfortunately
> needs to be reenabled on chk subtree repositories.
> 
> I'm not sure what the best answer is - should iter_changes take a
> recursive parameter?, recurse automatically? something else. Perhaps
> recursive is too generic (does it mean per-dir, or subtrees or what).
> 
> -Rob

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknKK5kACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI0tWQCeIy7jdyVSMEimnVLBNQxRLaww
BeMAoIOlpU/zl5sQHUf52nG9IpI5Gcs5
=nvpe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----