Quick bzr-svn question

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:41:57 +0100
> Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> What version of bzr-svn are you using? 2 to 4 days seems a bit much
>> for an import, given that e.g. the 270k revisions in OpenOffice took
>> around 20 hours (faster bzr format, but still).  
>>     
>
> I'm using using bzr and friends in Jaunty:
>
> mbt at zest:~$ dpkg -l|grep bzr|awk '{ print "Package: " $2 ", version: "
> $3 }'
> Package: bzr, version: 1.13~rc1-1build1
> Package: bzr-dbus, version: 0.1~bzr36-3
> Package: bzr-gtk, version: 0.95.0+bzr629-1ubuntu1
> Package: bzr-rebase, version: 0.4.4-1
> Package: bzr-svn, version: 0.5.3-1
> Package: bzrtools, version: 1.13.0-1
> Package: libmbca0, version: 0.0.3~bzr42-0ubuntu2
>
> Currently, I have 12,035 of 144,703 revisions.  They are taking between
> 1 and 10 seconds per revision, mostly around 3 seconds.  I estimate
> somewhere between 40 hours and 110 hours of time remaining in the
> import, assuming that the average is between 1 and 3 seconds for the
> rest of the import.
>   
Ah, so that's pretty current. One of the things that would help is a new 
subvertpy version (jaunty has 0.6.1, upstream has 0.6.5), that should 
fix some memory and performance issues. I'm not sure exactly how 
significant of an impact it would have.

Cheers,

Jelmer