[RFC] 1.13.1 was Patching 1.13?

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 23:53 -0500, Bob Tanner wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> > We should spin 13.1 then, this counts as a regression :(.
> 
> 
> I closed "bug"  https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/340209, not sure  
> why pbuilder was letting me down.
> 
> Looking for comments on releasing 1.13.1.
> 
> * Get the pyrex-generated C extension into the tarball and .zip  
> (#344465)
> * Documentation changes in NEWS for GNU ChangeLogs (#343928)
> 
> Others?

None from me; I mean, Andrew and I have more improvements landed
already, but releases are not about 'latest' :P

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090318/aab85952/attachment.pgp