Patching 1.13?

Robert Collins robert.collins at canonical.com
Wed Mar 18 00:33:26 GMT 2009


On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 19:21 -0500, Bob Tanner wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> >> On the other hand, the 1.13 tarball also doesn't include the
> >> pyrex-ified .c files, so [unless the person building has pyrex  
> >> around]
> >> the only C extension being built is patiencediff.
> >
> > We should spin 13.1 then, this counts as a regression :(.
> 
> 
> Can a testsuite be written to prevent this from happening again?

It could be but would be very expensive. The root cause is us requiring
a special step during distribution thats not automated robustly; we're
going to start versioning the .c files anyway, which will go a long way
to preventing it.

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090318/9132a65d/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list