[MERGE] Add optional 'fetch_spec' to argument to Repository.fetch
Jelmer Vernooij
jelmer at vernstok.nl
Sat Mar 7 15:30:21 GMT 2009
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:59 +1100, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> [...]
> > I've submitted this against my less-skips patch, because I needed the extra test
> > coverage while developing it.
>
> I was obviously too clever for bundle buggy. Now that less-skips has landed,
> here's a fresh merge directive against bzr.dev, so that BB will notice it. The
> description in my original mail still applies.
>
> (It would be nice if it were easy and fool-proof to send merge directives
> dependent on other outstanding merge requests...)
It would be nice if the fetch_spec parameter could be documented in
Fetch(). In particular, is it allowed to ignore this parameter ? Will
there be no revision id specified if this parameter is specified?
Cheers,
Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090307/bc7cad78/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list