bzr-gtk vs. QBzr

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 12:03 +0000, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 17:40 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > This is mainly because there's nobody actively working new features in
> > bzr-gtk these days. I don't think bzr-gtk is any more mature than QBzr
> > at the moment.
> Is this an indicator that Olive-GTK and bzr-gtk are going to be left to
> decay leaving QBzr and TortoiseBzr as the GUIs?  If so then the pressure
> would be on QBzr to develop a GUI similar to Olive-GTK.
I don't think this is an indicator bzr-gtk is going to be left to decay;
we are still doing the work to keep bzr-gtk running. New features depend
on whether there are people going to step up and contribute them.

Cheers,

Jelmer

-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: jelmer at jabber.fsfe.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090306/3bb172d7/attachment.pgp