Help with gatekeeper workflow.

[Kent Gibson]

Eric Berry wrote:
>
>
>     Why not use 'bzr send' to create a merge directive?  As long as you
>     have the bundle, you don't need to expose the private branch.  And
>     then, history would be preserved.  Or am I missing something here?
>
>     -John
>
>
> Not you, me. Haha, I'm missing something. :) Sorry, I hadn't gotten
> to the send action yet. This is awesome, if I use send, it will
> contain all the commits Joe made to his local branch, including the
> merges from trunk correct? And when I use merge, all his history is
> preserved?
>
Except tags - I don't think 'bzr merge <merge-directive>' propagates
tags - even if the merge directive includes a public branch.

Cheers,
Kent.