[MERGE] Changed diff filename from *.diff to *_diff.txt to make it easier to open on Windows.

[Alexander Belchenko]

Mark Hammond пишет:
> On 25/02/2009 9:38 AM, Gary van der Merwe wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Mark Hammond<skippy.hammond at gmail.com>
>>> What *is* the usual approach for qbzr?  If we don't have a .diff viewer,
>>> then there doesn't seem to be anything useful we can to the
>>> .diff/.patch/.bundle extensions at install time?
>>
>> * We could should the revisions in the bundle, against the branch you
>> are going to merge in qlog (something that qmerge should be doing.)

I guess Gary means: "we could show..." (s/should/show)

>> * We could show a diff based on the revision data in the bundle, not
>> the patch text.
> 
> I think these would be a little confusing; I don't even quite understand
> from the descriptions exactly how what I would see relates directly to
> the file I clicked on :)

We have to implement new q-command to show colored unidiff. We already has
all basic GUI, just need to implement parser of diff files to get the info
we need.

> 
> IMO, the only reasonable thing to do by default is show a simple diff
> viewer - anything else looks a little like a square peg in a round hole.

The best thing right now is to use external viewer. Or we need good diff
parser library written in Python we can use.

The proposal from Gary makes sense when we talk about bundles or merge-directives.

Even IIRC TSVN has in the context menu "Patch" command or something similar
to apply the patch (simple svn diff) to the working tree.

>> * We can open the merge dialog?
> 
> I think (optionally) adding a specific 'Merge' verb to those extensions
> *does* make good sense - meaning the user needs to use the context menu
> to get at it - but I don't think the default action should be a merge.
> 
> IMO, YMMV, etc... :)

Bear with us. Sometimes we wrote bad English prose.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
>