Empty merges

[Robert Collins]

On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 23:34 +0100, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> 
> I think it's expected behaviour.  I personally dislike it, but I'm
> sure
> people may argue it's just a corner case of something that has a
> perfectly good logical reason to be that way.

Its a reasonable outcome of requiring that folk have the chance to
review every merge; but its a bug - we should stop the merge when no
differences at a logical or content level are found.

(Sometimes merges record that 'A' and 'B' have reached the same place
independently - and that would be ok to record, but the flipflops are
not).

-Rob


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090216/794a30ba/attachment.pgp