[MERGE] Add specification for colocated-branches
Ian Clatworthy
ian.clatworthy at internode.on.net
Tue Feb 10 00:46:29 GMT 2009
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> The attached patch adds the co-located branches specification to
> doc/developer. The fact that this is a merge request should make it a
> bit easier to track its status.
I think we can land this now and refine it via follow-up patches
as required.
bb:tweak
> +than the current HEAD. Several options have been, each with its own
been *discussed*, ...
or "considered" if that's what you meant.
> + def get_branch(self, name):
> + """Returns the Branch object for the specifie branch."""
specified
> + def destroy_branch(self, name):
> + """Destroy the specified branch."""
Maybe a little more explanation as to the semantics of destroy?
> +If the particular BzrDir implementation doesn't support colocated
> +branches, it can just return a dummy container that just contains a HEAD
> +branch.
Would it be better to have an explicit method like "supports_colocated_branches()"?
Ian C.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list