[MERGE] New log formats controlling the display of merge revisions
Robert Collins
robertc at robertcollins.net
Thu Jan 15 07:32:52 GMT 2009
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 18:21 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > BTW, I also feel that "mainline is special" is a key feature
> > of Bazaar's overall user model. I understand that not everyone
> > agrees with this perspective. That doesn't make non-mainline
> > meaningless/unnecessary, just less interesting. Hiding less
> > interesting things *by default* is good UI design. My recent
> > change to status (hide non-tip pending merges) is another
> > example of adopting this UI design principle.
>
> I don't really like that change, but not enough to argue about it. So I
> didn't. I didn't like it because I'll now have to log the branch I
> merged to figure out what is included in the merge. It's going to be
> painful.
Bah that came across way grumpy, and I didn't mean it to. Don't write
emails with a stomach ache. And if I remember correctly there is a -v in
status now to show the display I need anyhow.
-Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090115/eaef676e/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list