bzr init showing info - time to revert it?

[Martin Pool]

On  6 Jan 2009, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:

> I think these abbreviated forms are an improvement. That seems
> uncontentious given the other responses in this thread. If you wanted to
> do that now I'd be happy to review it.
> 
> The other question, whether to show this without -v, seems more
> contentious. My sense is that there is more vocal support for
> silent-by-default, but I'm not sure that this isn't 'just' the
> core-unixy-types [of which I'm one :P]. But we can discuss this part
> some more without blocking improving what we do show.

I think it should not be totally silent by default, because there's
somewhat hidden state that affects the results: whether there is a
containing repository, and what format is used.  So I'd like to show
them concisely.

-- 
Martin