[PATCH] doc/en/user-guide/undoing_mistakes.txt: position of --opions

[Jari Aalto]

Andrew Bennetts <andrew.bennetts at canonical.com> writes:

> Andrew Bennetts has voted abstain.
> Status is now: Semi-approved
> Comment:
> I'm neutral on this.  I guess am more used to reading options as coming
> before arguments, but I don't know that it makes the docs any clearer to
> change the examples like this.  And it makes no difference to bzr.

It's quite customary to read:

     PROGRAM [GLOBAL OPTIONS] COMMAND [OPTIONS] <ARGS>

     cvs tag [options] <args>
     svn tag [options] <args>
     git tag [options] <args>

Jari