Recommended use of Bazaar for single-committer multiple-machine projects?

[Marius Kruger]

2008/12/13 Martin Pool <mbp at canonical.com>

> Getting rid of them would mean we could still have checkouts, but
> committing to a checkout would always go into its branch, whether that's
> on the same machine or elsewhere.  So this would mean checkouts of a
> remote branch would only really work if you had access to the server,
> much like in svn, though you would be able to do wt-only operations with
> no connection.
>
> We wouldn't need the four-way merge of wt-basis, wt, local branch,
> remote branch, that can currently happen in updates.
>
Then you'd also have to remove unbind (because you can unbind, commit, bind)

I just think we should refuse if there are changes in wt and local branch,
forcing people to do another commit --local to have a clean working tree
before updating (like merge). In this way we protect the user from
accidentally messing things up, and we don't loose functionality.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20081213/f5a85067/attachment.htm