RFC: Always use remote branches?

Andrew Bennetts andrew.bennetts at canonical.com
Mon Nov 17 12:11:21 GMT 2008

Previous message: RFC: Always use remote branches?
Next message: How do we fix 288751?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Martin Pool wrote:
[...]
> For testing, I think having a loopback+file:///foo/ optionally
> available would be a good start.

I agree.

-Andrew.

Previous message: RFC: Always use remote branches?
Next message: How do we fix 288751?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the bazaar mailing list