RFC: Always use remote branches?

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

I was just thinking about the possibility of using RemoteBranch all the
time.  It would allow us to test that functionality more thoroughly, and
might allow us to take better advantage of multiple cores (if we were a
bit more async, I guess), since there would be two processes in play.
We could run the smart protocol over a pipe, or on uniprocessor
machines, we could even do an "in-process pipe".

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkZucoACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI0VsACdF6/Chcqa2SRdG4Y+PhtCjS1T
+hEAmwTvoLUW9G3NPtvwz44f6gm1dOOF
=JFDV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----